Study reveals lack of pet support services for domestic violence victims

A recent study highlights the large gap in pet support services for owners in crises.

Amongst those most affected are victims of domestic and family violence who often stay in the home for their pet.

The study by James Cook University shows that owners facing an emergency situation, such as domestic violence or natural disasters, are often left with little to no pet support.

The university’s review of international research evidence and Australian policies focuses on the human-animal bond. Particularly, in situations of separation involving domestic violence, homelessness, and natural disasters.

“When people are being forced to separate in the context of a crisis situation, such as natural disaster, homelessness or domestic violence, it can result in psychological distress and the risk to their health, and well-being and safety are really impacted,” University PhD candidate Jasmine Montgomery says.

“Sadly, the review also confirmed that a common outcome for pets in cases of domestic violence was maltreatment and/or death.”

She adds that concern for their pets’ safety is a key factor that makes victims of violence reluctant to leave.

“In a lot of cases of domestic violence, there is evidence to suggest that people will delay leaving their relationship to protect their pet,” she says.

“This is often because there’s a lack of shelters or housing places which can accommodate pets.

“Or a lack of trust placed in formal support systems that they won’t be separated from their pet.

“In those cases where threats to pets are made, victims can be lured back by the perpetrator which places significant risk to their safety as well.”

Owners risking lives during natural disasters

The study calls for a more holistic approach to crisis support, one that recognises the importance of pets in many people’s lives.

Suggested measures include the integration of pet care services within human health and social services. Another idea is the establishment of temporary housing solutions that accommodate pets.

Tellingly, the review found human “superiority” and disparities over who is responsible for pet welfare as key factors.

And those attitudes are from within the crisis support services for people and their pets.

Montgomery says there needs to be a shift in mindset to factor in the needs and complexities of pets. Especially when it comes to planning for crisis situations and providing pet owner support services.

“Often, it’s expected people will choose human interests over animals at all costs, without consideration of the shared human-animal bond,” she said.

“What we need to start doing is taking our pets, and the value of our pets, very seriously. And, as a collective in the community, sharing that responsibility.

“Placing the needs of pets in those areas of policy development, legislation, service provision and housing to help prevent unacceptable outcomes such as animal maltreatment or death.”

Montgomery is now conducting a nationwide, qualitative study of forced separation from animals in domestic violence scenarios. Her aim is to confirm the service gaps of current support systems in place for victims and their pets.

“I’m hopeful the study will develop recommendations that inform a national policy framework to provide that support in the domestic violence and animal welfare sector.”